Akin, CeydaInan, Ozgur2024-02-232024-02-2320222149-9063https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2022.51422https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16415Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of lithium disilicate and zirconium dioxide all ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 premolar teeth with two different marginal finish lines were divided into 2 groups to produce zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns. The crowns were cemented by two different cements (n=10). Samples were stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin solution and the dye penetration was scored. Statistical comparisons were made using two-way ANOVA and two-sample t-test. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in preparation types (p>0.05). However, ceramic systems and cement types for the microleakage test Conclusion: The use of self-adhesive cement is recommended for lithium disilicate restoration to minimize marginal microleakage.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMicroleakageAll-CeramicMarginal Finish LineThe Investigation of the Marginal Microleakage of Ceramic Veneer Crowns with Different Finish LinesArticle234488494WOS:00091754860001210.4274/meandros.galenos.2022.51422