Arşiv logosu
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
Arşiv logosu
  • Koleksiyonlar
  • DSpace İçeriği
  • Analiz
  • Talep/Soru
  • Türkçe
  • English
  • Giriş
    Yeni kullanıcı mısınız? Kayıt için tıklayın. Şifrenizi mi unuttunuz?
  1. Ana Sayfa
  2. Yazara Göre Listele

Yazar "Karaarslan, Faruk" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
  • Yükleniyor...
    Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Çağdaş İslâm Düşüncesinde Aliya İzzetbegoviç
    (2016) Akın, Mahmut Hakkı; Karaarslan, Faruk
    Bosna Hersek eski Cumhurbaşkanı Aliya İzzetbegoviç aynı zamanda çağdaş İslâm düşüncesine özgün katkılar sunmuş bir düşünürdür. İslâm dünyasının meselelerine odaklanmış ve üçüncü yol anlayışına bağlı olarak bir İslâmî yeniden doğuş üzerine düşünceler geliştirmiştir. İslâm'ı maneviyatçılık ve materyalizmin dışındaki tek alternatif olarak kabul eden İzzetbegoviç, İslâm dünyasının Müslüman toplumlardaki tutucu gelenekselcilik ile İslâm'ı reddeden modernist anlayış arasında bir kriz yaşadığını iddia etmiştir. Onun çağdaş İslâm düşüncesine katkıları, özellikle bu krizi tanımlama ve aşma konusunda dikkate değerdir
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    DIALECTICAL METHOD IN ALI SHARIATI: HUMAN, SOCIETY AND PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY
    (Ilahiyat Bilimleri Arastirma Vakfi, 2023) Tekin, Ferhat; Karaarslan, Faruk
    Iranian intellectual Ali Shariati has taken the dialectical approach as a basis in most of the issues he tried to solve. When we look at the studies on Shariati, it is seen that there are no studies that directly address his dialectical understanding. Therefore, this study focuses on Shariati's dialectical understanding in order to make a contribution towards filling this gap in the literature. In the text, first of all, what the dialectical method is and how the main thinkers (Hegel, Marx, Sartre, Gurvitch, etc.) who had an impact on Shariati's dialectic approach, handled the dialectic. Then, how the human, society and philosophy of history, which are the three main issues that come to the fore in Shariati's social philosophy, is discussed dialectically. What the dialectic means for Shari'ati; it will be emphasized why the dialectical approach is important in his approach to human, society and philosophy of history. Likewise, in which aspects did Shariati apply the dialectical perspective and in which cases the dualistic perspective? Therefore, in order to answer these questions, Shariati's works, which he analyzed within the framework of dialectics, were determined, examined and interpreted. In this context, the document/literature review method was used in the study. In this study, first of all, what the dialectical method is and how the main thinkers (Hegel, Marx, Sartre, Gurvitch, etc.) who had an impact on Shariati's understanding of dialectic approached the dialectic were examined. Then, how the human, society and philosophy of history, which are the three main issues that come to the fore in Shariati's social philosophy, is discussed dialectically. Finally, a general evaluation and discussion is given.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    The Vital Point of History and Memory The Periodization Problem in History and Le Goff's Periodization Conception
    (Ilem, 2019) Karaarslan, Faruk
    The periodization of history means more than dividing time into specific segments. In this respect, periodization must not be considered as only a matter of discussion inside the field of history. The fact that periodization implies characteristic factors makes it a problematic for other social sciences. In the context of sociology, the most important among these factors are memory and memory construction. Vital point of history and memory, periodization implies a more special meaning and - whilst actually it is essential to history - has a role of memory construction when coupled with an ideological formation. In other words, periodization is a memory construction. This work covers Jacques Le Goff's approach of history and the relation between periodization and memory in regard to his concept of periodization. Le Goff's discussion around the periodization of the modern western history issue and problematizing relative to the content of periodization allows history and memory's connection and reveals the relation between periodization and ideology. In this context, the objective of this work is to run a discussion about the relation between periodization and memory (and its construction) through Le Goff's conception of the periodization issue. That discussion can only be run by including relation paths such as history-memory-sociology. In this sense, we will suggest that, on the one hand, periodization is essential to history and, on the other hand, it gives ground to the production of a mechanism of dominance through its aspect of memory construction. In addition to this, we will put forward certain suggestion in order to overcome that barrier.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    The Vital Point of History and Memory The Periodization Problem in History and Le Goff's Periodization Conception
    (Ilem, 2019) Karaarslan, Faruk
    The periodization of history means more than dividing time into specific segments. In this respect, periodization must not be considered as only a matter of discussion inside the field of history. The fact that periodization implies characteristic factors makes it a problematic for other social sciences. In the context of sociology, the most important among these factors are memory and memory construction. Vital point of history and memory, periodization implies a more special meaning and - whilst actually it is essential to history - has a role of memory construction when coupled with an ideological formation. In other words, periodization is a memory construction. This work covers Jacques Le Goff's approach of history and the relation between periodization and memory in regard to his concept of periodization. Le Goff's discussion around the periodization of the modern western history issue and problematizing relative to the content of periodization allows history and memory's connection and reveals the relation between periodization and ideology. In this context, the objective of this work is to run a discussion about the relation between periodization and memory (and its construction) through Le Goff's conception of the periodization issue. That discussion can only be run by including relation paths such as history-memory-sociology. In this sense, we will suggest that, on the one hand, periodization is essential to history and, on the other hand, it gives ground to the production of a mechanism of dominance through its aspect of memory construction. In addition to this, we will put forward certain suggestion in order to overcome that barrier.

| Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi | Kütüphane | Açık Erişim Politikası | Rehber | OAI-PMH |

Bu site Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile korunmaktadır.


Yaka Mahallesi, Yeni Meram Caddesi, Kasım Halife Sokak, No: 11/1 42090 - Meram, Konya, TÜRKİYE
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz lütfen bize bildirin

DSpace 7.6.1, Powered by İdeal DSpace

DSpace yazılımı telif hakkı © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Çerez ayarları
  • Gizlilik politikası
  • Son Kullanıcı Sözleşmesi
  • Geri bildirim Gönder