Yazar "Uysal, Cuneyt" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe A comparative assessment of SPECO and MOPSA on costing of exergy destruction(Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 2020) Uysal, Cuneyt; Ozen, Dilek Nur; Kurt, Huseyin; Kwak, Ho YoungThis paper presents the comparison of specific exergy costing (SPECO) and modified productive structure analysis (MOPSA) method to test their abilities on costing of exergy destruction. MOPSA method is applied to a combined supercritical CO(2)regenerative cycle and organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures for gas turbine waste heat recovery system. The results obtained with applying SPECO method to the system are taken from literature. The exergy destruction cost rate of overall system is obtained to be $86.08/h and $1,113.13/h for MOPSA and SPECO methods, respectively. The exergoeconomic factor of overall system is found to be 31.88% for SPECO method, while this value is found to be 85.82% for MOPSA method. The obtained results with applying MOPSA method for exergy destruction cost rate are significantly lower and more consistent compared to the results obtained by SPECO method.Öğe A comparative assessment of SPECO and MOPSA on costing of exergy destruction(Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 2020) Uysal, Cuneyt; Ozen, Dilek Nur; Kurt, Huseyin; Kwak, Ho YoungThis paper presents the comparison of specific exergy costing (SPECO) and modified productive structure analysis (MOPSA) method to test their abilities on costing of exergy destruction. MOPSA method is applied to a combined supercritical CO(2)regenerative cycle and organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures for gas turbine waste heat recovery system. The results obtained with applying SPECO method to the system are taken from literature. The exergy destruction cost rate of overall system is obtained to be $86.08/h and $1,113.13/h for MOPSA and SPECO methods, respectively. The exergoeconomic factor of overall system is found to be 31.88% for SPECO method, while this value is found to be 85.82% for MOPSA method. The obtained results with applying MOPSA method for exergy destruction cost rate are significantly lower and more consistent compared to the results obtained by SPECO method.Öğe THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF T56 TURBOPROP ENGINE UNDER DIFFERENT LOAD CONDITIONS(Turkish Soc Thermal Sciences Technology, 2020) Ozen, Dilek Nur; Uysal, Cuneyt; Balli, OzgurIn this study, T56 turboprop engine was theoretically modelled for 75% load, 100% load, military (MIL) mode, and Take-off mode conditions. For each load conditions, thermoeconomic analyses of T56 turboprop engine were performed to allocate the unit costs of shaft work and thrust and to determine exergy destruction cost rates for system equipment. In thermoeconomic analyses, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO) and Modified Productive Structure Analysis (MOPSA) methods were used. MOPSA method gave higher unit cost values for shaft work and thrust compared to SPECO method. As a result, for Take-off mode, the unit cost of shaft work transferred to propeller was determined to be 78.87 $/GJ in SPECO method, while this value was calculated to be 84.68 $/GJ with MOPSA method. The unit cost of negentropy of T56 turboprop engine decreased with increasing in engine load and ranged from 14.98 $/GJ to 11.08 $/GJ. The exergy destruction cost rates obtained with MOPSA method for the system equipment were considerably lower than the results obtained with SPECO method. For instance, in Take-off mode, exergy destruction cost rate of combustion chamber was calculated to be 865.10 $/h in SPECO method, whereas it was calculated to be 247.94 $/h in MOPSA method. The exergoeconomic factor of overall system was determined to be 23.07% in SPECO method, and 54.16% in MOP SA method for Take-off mode.