Comparison of Non-Hilar Clamping Simple Enucleation and Enucleo-Resection of Exophytic Renal Tumors

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Emrullah
dc.contributor.authorPiskin, Mehmet Mesut
dc.contributor.authorKaralezli, Giray
dc.contributor.authorGurbuz, Recai
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:48:40Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To retrospectively evaluate our institutional experience with non-hilar-clamping simple enucleation (SE) and enucleoresection (ER) for the treatment of exophytic renal tumors regarding their oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients treated between 2006 and 2013 for clinical exophytic T1-T2a renal tumors using open nephron-sparing surgery. Results: A total of 33 patients underwent SE and 39 underwent ER. The mean tumor size was 38.7 mm. None of the patients had positive surgical margins. No local recurrences were observed during the postoperative follow-up period (mean 40.7 +/- 23.4 months); however, ipsilateral adrenal and contralateral kidney metastasis was detected in one of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry Score, operative time, or intraoperative blood loss in the non-hilar-clamping SE and ER groups (P > .05). During the third postoperative month, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels in the SE group were significantly reduced compared with the preoperative eGFR levels (P = .046). Conclusion: SE and ER with non-hilar clamping are safe, acceptable approaches for treating exophytic renal tumors.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2416en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26706737en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84951937999en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/17761
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000368321800006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectRenal Cellen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectKidney Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectNephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectAdverse Effectsen_US
dc.subjectOrgan Sparing Treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectMethodsen_US
dc.subjectGlomerular Filtration Rateen_US
dc.titleComparison of Non-Hilar Clamping Simple Enucleation and Enucleo-Resection of Exophytic Renal Tumorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu