Comparison of root resorption after bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with the use of microtomography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Mucahid
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Root resorption was compared between bone-borne and tooth tissue-borne rapid maxillary expansion patients with the use of microtomography. Methods The study included 20 patients (ages 11-16 years) requiring fixed orthodontic treatment who underwent extraction of their first premolars after rapid maxillary expansion with the use of modified appliances. One side of the appliance covered the teeth with acrylic, while the other side was fixed to the palatal bone by means of a miniscrew. After 3 months' retention, the appliance was removed and teeth were extracted and examined with the use of microtomography. Results: When the apical, middle, and cervical thirds, as well as the buccal and lingual sides, were compared, the volume loss was significantly higher in the tooth tissue-borne group than in the bone-borne group (P <0.01). The least volume loss occurred on the cervical third lingual surface in the tooth tissue-borne group and on the middle third buccal surface in the bone-borne group. In the former group, least resorption occurred on the cervical third and highest resorption on the buccal side. In the latter group, surfaces showed no significant changes. Conclusions: More root resorption occurred in the tooth tissue-borne group, mostly in the apical and middle thirds. The amount of resorption on the buccal surface was higher than that on the lingual surface.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University foundation [15102046]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by a grant from Selcuk University foundation (number: 15102046). The authors are grateful to Dr. Ayse Menzek and research assistant Ece Bayir for their helpful suggestions.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.021
dc.identifier.endpage190en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30712689en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060765643en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage182en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11555
dc.identifier.volume155en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000457242700010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleComparison of root resorption after bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with the use of microtomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu