Comparison of Hemodynamics Recovery Profile and Costs of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl-Based Sevoflurane Anesthesia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUluer, Mehmet Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorTopal, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTavlan, Aybars
dc.contributor.authorErol, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorKilicaslan, Alper
dc.contributor.authorOtelcioglu, Seref
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:31Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This trial was designed to compare the effects of fentanyl and remifentanil on hemodynamic parameters, postoperative recovery, sevoflurane consumption and the cost of anesthetics. Material and Methods: Cases that were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were assigned to two groups with simple random sampling method, as Group F (Fentanyl) and Group R (Remifentanil), each including 30 patients. The anesthetic induction was initiated by administering 1-2 mg/kg propofol bolus based on the bispectral index (BIS) value followed by 2 mu g/kg fentanyl in Group F patients and 1 mu g/kg remifentanil in Group R patients administered in 60 seconds as iv bolus; subsequently, 0.5 mg/kg iv atracurium was administered. For maintenance of anesthesia, 50% oxygen in-air was administered at 4 L/min; the end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was adjusted to achieve a BIS value of 45 to 55. In Group R, remifentanil 0.25 mu g/kg/min infusion was continued. The addition of 0.5 mu g/kg fentanyl was planned as required in Group F. Sevoflurane end-tidal concentration and the changing times were recorded. For each case, the sevoflurane consumption was calculated using the Dion formula. Results: In Group R, the hemodynamic control, particularly the suppression of response to intubation was more successful than in Group F. The eye opening times and Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) transfer times were shorter in Group R relative to Group F (p=0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). Sevoflurane consumption was lower in the Group R (7.18 +/- 3.45 mL) compared to Group F (16.45 +/- 7.15 mL) (p=0.001). The total anesthetic drug cost was similar between the groups. Conclusion: Compared to fentanyl, remifentanil provided a better intraoperative hemodynamic control, faster postoperative recovery and a favorable effect on anesthetic drug cost by decreasing sevoflurane consumption, eliminating the disadvantages of its price.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/medsci.2011-25271
dc.identifier.endpage714en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0292
dc.identifier.issn2146-9040
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857830976en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage707en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-25271
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16874
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000307199900015en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOrtadogu Ad Pres & Publ Coen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCost Controlen_US
dc.subjectFentanylen_US
dc.subjectRemifentanilen_US
dc.subjectSevofluraneen_US
dc.titleComparison of Hemodynamics Recovery Profile and Costs of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl-Based Sevoflurane Anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu