Comparison the effects of prilocaine and the addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBorazan, Hale
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Osman
dc.contributor.authorUluer, Mehmet Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorKececioglu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSaritas, Tuba Berra
dc.contributor.authorOtelcioglu, Seref
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic and analgesic effects of prilocaine alone, prilocaine added dexketoprofen and dexamethasone during intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Methods: Forty five patients undergoing forearm or hand surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive (Group P) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine; (Group PDK) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine plus 50 mg dexketoprofen; (Group PDM) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine plus 8 mg dexamethasone in total 40 ml volume for IVRA. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, hemodynamic datas, duration of analgesia and tourniquet, time to first analgesic requirement, visual analog scale (VAS), total analgesic consumption in 24 hours and patient satisfaction score were assessed and recorded. Results: Time to onset of sensory block was found to be longer in Group P (p<0.05), though no significance was found according to sensory block recovery times amoung groups. Time to onset of motor block was found to be longer and recovery time of motor block was found to be shorter in Group P (p<0.05). Time to first analgesic requirement was found to be longer in Group PDK, and was found to be high in Group PDM than Group PDK(p<0.05). The VAS scores was found to be high and patient satisfaction scale was found to be low in Group P (p<0.05). Conclusion: The addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine during IVRA improves the quality of both anesthesia and analgesia moreover dexketoprofen provides beter postoperative analgesia during the first 24 hour after surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/agri.2014.93064
dc.identifier.endpage72en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24943855en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84903468311en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage65en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/agri.2014.93064
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16909
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000421310500003en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgri-The Journal Of The Turkish Society Of Algologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDexamethasoneen_US
dc.subjectDexketoprofenen_US
dc.subjectIntravenous Regional Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectPrilocaineen_US
dc.titleComparison the effects of prilocaine and the addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu