A comparative study on phenolic composition, antioxidant activity and essential oil content of wild and cultivated sage (Salvia fruticosa Miller) as influenced by storage

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDincer, Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorTopuz, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorSahin-Nadeem, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Kubra Sultan
dc.contributor.authorCam, Ihsan Burak
dc.contributor.authorTontul, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorGokturk, Ramazan Suleyman
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:03:15Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, the main quality parameters such as moisture content, extract yields, total essential oils, phenolic content and composition, and antioxidant activity of wild and cultivated Salvia fruticosa were elaborately investigated in six-month storage period for two consecutive years. The cultivated samples had higher total phenolic content than those of the wild samples. On the contrary, wild samples had higher extract yields, total flavonoids and total essential oils. Seventeen different phenolic compounds, composed of seven phenolic acids and ten flavonoids, were identified and quantified in both cultivated and wild S. fruticosa. Rosmarinic, p-coumaric and caffeic acids were determined to be the principal phenolic acids. The major flavonoids however were myricetin, morin and luteolin. The phenolic components of vanillic acid, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-coumaric acid, myricetin and morin increased, whereas caffeic acid, catechin, epicatechin, luteolin and apigenin decreased by cultivation. The phenolic components were found to be either lower or not changed in consecutive harvesting year. They also did not significantly change during the storage period. The antioxidant activity of the samples was found to be higher for the second harvesting year whereas there were no significant differences between wild and cultivated S. fruticosa during storage period. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) [106T747]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank the TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for financial support (Project No.: 106T747) and Research Administration Unit of Akdeniz University (Antalya, Turkey).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.032
dc.identifier.endpage176en_US
dc.identifier.issn0926-6690
dc.identifier.issn1872-633X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84858199450en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/12036
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000303301300025en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofIndustrial Crops And Productsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSalvia Fruticosaen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant Activityen_US
dc.subjectCultivationen_US
dc.subjectWilden_US
dc.subjectPhenolicsen_US
dc.subjectStorageen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on phenolic composition, antioxidant activity and essential oil content of wild and cultivated sage (Salvia fruticosa Miller) as influenced by storageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu