Effects of interferential current stimulation in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective randomized sham-controlled study

dc.contributor.authorKorkut, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Emine Turen
dc.contributor.authorCelenay, Seyda Toprak
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:43:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis The objective was to investigate the effects of interferential (IF) current stimulation on pelvic floor symptoms, prolapse stages, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength/endurance, quality of life (QoL), sexual function, perception of subjective improvement (PSI), and satisfaction in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods The patients were randomly divided into the IF (n=13) and sham groups (n=12). Lifestyle advice was given in both groups. Active IF current was applied in the IF group and sham IF was applied in the sham group 3 days a week for 8 weeks. The following tools were used for data evaluation: pelvic floor symptom severity with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), POP with the simplified POP-quantification system, PFM strength/endurance with a perineometer, QoL with the Prolapse Quality of Life Scale (P-QoL), and sexual function with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Scale (PISQ-12). Evaluations were made before treatment (BT), mid-term (MT, 4th week), and after treatment (AT). PSI and satisfaction were evaluated AT with Likert-type scales. Results In the intergroup comparison AT, a greater increase in PFM strength/endurance, P-QoL-role limitations, P-QoL-sleep/energy scores, PSI, and satisfaction level, and a decrease in cystocele stages were observed in the IF group than in the sham group (p<0.05). Further, there was a greater increase in PFM endurance in the IF group in MT (p<0.05). Conclusions Interferential current stimulation was effective in improving POP stage, PFM strength/endurance, and QoL in women with POP. IF current stimulation can be used as a complementary treatment method in women with POP.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-022-05402-3
dc.identifier.endpage289en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36326860en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85141166097en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage279en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05402-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/10842
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000878438100001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer London Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectric Stimulation Therapyen_US
dc.subjectPelvic Flooren_US
dc.subjectPelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectQuality Of Lifeen_US
dc.titleEffects of interferential current stimulation in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective randomized sham-controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar