Comparison of the Stress Distribution in Class I and Class II Amalgam and Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations Using CAD-FEM Modeling
dc.contributor.author | Tuncdemir, Makbule Tugba | |
dc.contributor.author | Yesilyurt, Nilgun Gulbahce | |
dc.contributor.author | Arikan, Mahmut | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-23T14:26:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-23T14:26:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | NEÜ | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study compares the mechanical strengths of bulk-fill composite resin and amalgam material to investigate the stress distribution and capacity to mitigate stress of restored Class I and Class II teeth under chewing loads, using finite element analysis. A 3D model of a human mandibular first molar and four Class I (C1) and Class II (C2) caries, including 95-degree cavity-margin angles, were created. Different material combinations were simulated: model C1-A and C2-A, with an amalgam material; and model C1-C and C2-C, with a bulk-fill composite resin. Solid 3D elements with four grid points were employed for modeling the tooth. A vertical occlusal load of 600 N was applied, and nodal displacements on the bottom cutting surfaces were constrained in all directions. All materials were assumed to be isotropic and elastic, and a static linear analysis was performed. The highest maximum principal stress was observed in C2-C, followed by C1-C, C2-A, and C1-A, respectively. The maximum principal stress load on the lingual cusp was recorded at the junction of the lingual margin (C1-C and C2-C), and stress was recorded on the line of restoration and enamel (C1-A and C2-A). Restoration materials and cavity preparations influence the stress distribution at the restoration-tooth interface and, consequently, the measured bond strength. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.11607/prd.5024 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | E9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0198-7569 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1945-3388 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33528447 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85101729491 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | E1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.5024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/14309 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000614179800001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Quintessence Publishing Co Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal Of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | [Keyword Not Available] | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the Stress Distribution in Class I and Class II Amalgam and Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations Using CAD-FEM Modeling | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |