Comparison of two different flap designs for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMenziletoglu, D.
dc.contributor.authorGuler, A. Y.
dc.contributor.authorBasturk, F.
dc.contributor.authorIsik, B. K.
dc.contributor.authorErdur, E. A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:13:01Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:13:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We compared the effect of lingual-based triangular flap with buccal-based triangular flap on postoperative complications in impacted third molar surgery. Material and methods: Thirty patients aged between 18 and 36 (mean age 19.65 +/- 2.14) were included. They all had bilateral impacted third molars. We used buccal-based triangular flap on a randomly selected side (Group 1) and lingual-based triangular flap on the other side (Group 2). We evaluated pain during 7 days after the surgery; swelling and trismus on postoperative 2., 7. and 14. days; wound dehiscence and alveolar osteitis incidence on postoperative 7. and 14. days. Results: Pain was significantly higher in Group 2 during 7 days postoperatively (P < .05). Trismus and swelling were also more prominent in Group 2 on postoperative days 2 and 7. In Group 2, the duration of the surgery in was longer than Group 1 (P < .05). In Group 1, 17 patients (56.7%) had wound dehiscence and 6 patients (20%) in Group 2 (P < .05). No alveolar osteitis developed in either groups. Conclusion: The buccal-based triangular flap seems better with regard to postoperative pain, swelling and trismus. On the other hand, the lingual-based triangular flap had a lesser incidence for wound dehiscence. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.006
dc.identifier.endpage372en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-8509
dc.identifier.issn2468-7855
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31476539en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071967891en_US
dc.identifier.startpage368en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/12250
dc.identifier.volume121en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000572692400010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Stomatology Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFlap Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectThird Molar Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectSwellingen_US
dc.subjectTrismusen_US
dc.titleComparison of two different flap designs for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu