Static and dynamic postural control of postpartum women of different delivery methods
dc.contributor.author | Baran, Emine | |
dc.contributor.author | Emekci, Tugba | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-23T14:02:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-23T14:02:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | NEÜ | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postural control between nulligravida women and women who have given birth by vaginal or cesarean section. Methods: Women who had only vaginal delivery in the previous 1-3 years were included in the vaginal delivery group (n = 27), those who had only cesarean delivery in the previous 1-3 years were included in the cesarean section group (n = 28), and those who had never given birth were included in the control group (n = 32). Evaluations were administered 6-8 days after the ovulation phase. Postural control of the participants was evaluated with the computerized dynamic posturography device. Results: A total of 87 women with a mean age of 29.4 +/- 4 years and a mean body mass index of 24.1 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2) were included in the study. Antero-posterior somatosensory organization test values of the vaginal delivery group were lower than the control group (p = 0.0016). The cesarean delivery group had statistically lower antero-posterior somatosensory (p < 0.001 and p = 0.0013) and medio-lateral somatosensory (p = 0.002 and p = 0.017, respectively) test scores compared to the control group and the vaginal delivery group. Conclusions: It was observed that women who birthed with vaginal or cesarean delivery had impaired somato-sensory postural control. There is definitely a need for further studies with a long-term follow-up examining the effects of postural control during pregnancy and the postpartum period. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0966-6362 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-2219 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35190316 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85124707630 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.007 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11919 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 93 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000820132400010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ireland Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Gait & Posture | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Computerized Dynamic Posturography | en_US |
dc.subject | Vaginal Delivery | en_US |
dc.subject | Cesarean Delivery | en_US |
dc.subject | Postural Control | en_US |
dc.subject | Limits Of Stability | en_US |
dc.title | Static and dynamic postural control of postpartum women of different delivery methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |