Subscapularis Tendon Slip Number and Coracoid Overlap Are More Related Parameters for Subcoracoid Impingement in Subscapularis Tears: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAtaoglu, Muhammet Baybars
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAyanoglu, Tacettin
dc.contributor.authorKanatli, Ulunay
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:09Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the effects of the subscapularis tendon slip number (STSN) and coracoid morphology by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with and without subscapularis tears. Methods: Patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between February 2004 and June 2015 were re-evaluated. Those with a subscapularis tear (study group) and those with other pathologies (control group) were compared with each other. Magnetic resonance imaging scans and surgery videos of the patients were reassessed. Transverse and sagittal coracohumeral distance (CHD), coracoid overlap (CO), coraco-coracoid base angle (CBA), coracoglenoid distance (CGD), and STSN were measured. Results: The study and control groups comprised 141 and 78 patients, respectively. The mean age was 57.01 +/- 10.95 (similar in both the groups). The mean transverse CHD and sagittal CHD were not different between the groups and also between female and male patients. For the study and control groups, the mean CBA and CGD values were also similar. The mean CO was 24.01 +/- 4.9 and 21.29 +/- 4.58 for the study and control groups, respectively (P < .001). With the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CO, the sensitivity was 62% and the specificity was 64% at the cutoff value of 22.85 mm. The STSN was in the range between 1 and 6; the STSN was 3 or less in 61.5% of the study group and in 38.5% of the control group (P = .005). Conclusions: The CO was the most valuable parameter predicting any potential subcoracoid impingement, and the STSN was inversely correlated with subscapularis tears. However, in predicting a potential subcoracoid impingement, the CHD measurements were not significant, as well the CGD and CBA.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.003
dc.identifier.endpage742en_US
dc.identifier.issn0749-8063
dc.identifier.issn1526-3231
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27939068en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85008219888en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage734en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11608
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000400439200009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArthroscopy-The Journal Of Arthroscopic And Related Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleSubscapularis Tendon Slip Number and Coracoid Overlap Are More Related Parameters for Subcoracoid Impingement in Subscapularis Tears: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu