An experimental study on the effects of various drill types on drilling performance of GFRP composite pipes and damage formation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGemi, Lokman
dc.contributor.authorMorkavuk, Sezer
dc.contributor.authorKoklu, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorGemi, Dilek Soylu
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:37Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractDrilling is the most commonly used machining operation among others for assembly applications. The necessity of this operation has come to the forefront in composite materials that are becoming widespread nowadays. In this study, drilling performance of glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite pipes used in many sectors such as natural gas transmission lines, pressurized sewer lines, industrial waste transmission, defense industry, and construction industry was investigated. The GFRP pipe was produced by filament winding method with a winding angle of +/-55 degrees. Different drill types (conventional twist drill, brad and spur drill, and brad center drill) with a drill diameter of 4 mm were utilized for drilling the pipe and the effect of drill type on the drilling performance was investigated. Drilling tests were performed at a constant 5000 rpm spindle speed and six different feed rate parameters (25, 75, 125, 175, 225, and 275 mm/min). Thrust forces generated during drilling were recorded and after the drilling operations, hole exit surface damage, and borehole surface damage were examined by a digital microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that the brad center drill produced lower thrust forces while the twist drill generated higher thrust forces. The severity of damages could vary depending on the tool geometry and feed rate. Especially, at lower feed rates, conventional twist drill results with increased delamination and uncut fibers as compared with other drills. The brad center drill presents better performance since it generates fewer damages. Also, it is observed that these damages formed in the winding angle direction (orientation).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.023
dc.identifier.endpage194en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-8368
dc.identifier.issn1879-1069
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066112227en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11764
dc.identifier.volume172en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000482513400021en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofComposites Part B-Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite Pipeen_US
dc.subjectDamage Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDamage Modesen_US
dc.subjectDrillingen_US
dc.subjectFilament Windingen_US
dc.subjectGfrp Pipeen_US
dc.subjectMachinabilityen_US
dc.titleAn experimental study on the effects of various drill types on drilling performance of GFRP composite pipes and damage formationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu