Are YouTube videos claiming to describe lumbar spinal manipulation techniques adequate?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorDinc, Engin
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Tugba
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:20:29Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:20:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectiveYouTube has become a digital visual library in almost all fields of life, including medicine. Healthcare professionals and students frequently use YouTube to gain new skills and knowledge; however, the content of these videos has not been scientifically evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the descriptive adequacy and quality of YouTube videos on lumbar spine manipulation techniques (LSMTs) prepared by different healthcare professionals.MethodsThe first 50 most relevant videos retrieved on searching YouTube for the keyword 'lumbar spinal manipulation techniques' were included in the study. The video metrics (total duration, number of views, time since upload, number of comments, number of likes, and number of dislikes) that could be accessed from video descriptions were recorded. However the videos were scored according to manipulation definition criteria proposed by the American Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT manipulation description score - AAOMPT-MDS) and benchmark criteria for quality of digital content by the Journal of American Medical Association's (JAMA). The video metrics, AAOMPT-MDS and JAMA scores of the videos prepared by medical doctors, chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists were compared.ResultsVideo metrics of groups were similar. The mean AAOMPT-MDS of the videos was 2.40 & PLUSMN; 1.57 out of 6.00 (higher score was better), and the mean JAMA score was 2.14 & PLUSMN; 1.05 out of 4.00 (higher score was better). Videos created by all professional groups had statistically comparable AAOMPT-MDS and JAMA scores (p > 0.05).ConclusionAlthough YouTube videos on LSMTs offer valuable information for professionals and students, creators should follow the proposed recommendations when producing these videos to ensure quality content and systematic presentation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10669817.2023.2244398
dc.identifier.endpage455en_US
dc.identifier.issn1066-9817
dc.identifier.issn2042-6186
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37551750en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166972162en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2244398
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/13176
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001043211300001en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Manual & Manipulative Therapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLow Back Painen_US
dc.subjectIntervertebral Disc Herniationen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectManual Therapyen_US
dc.titleAre YouTube videos claiming to describe lumbar spinal manipulation techniques adequate?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu