Comparison of early period sexual function parameters between surgical repair and conservative treatment after penile fracture

dc.contributor.authorTaskapu, Hakan Hakki
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Mehmet Giray
dc.contributor.authorEcer, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorUcmak, Harun
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Arif
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: Comparison of early period sexual function parameters in patients who had surgical repair and conservative follow-up after penile fracture and the evaluation of surgical intervention time on these parameters were planned in this study. Materials and methods: Total of 26 patients who were treated for penile fracture were evaluated. 19 patients had surgical repair and 7 patients had conservative treatment.Sexual function and erectile dysfunction (ED) degree of the patients before penile fracture and in the 12th week after fracture were evaluated with 5-question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire, Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Sexual Encounter Pro-file(SEP) 2 and SEP 3. Parameters showing sexual function before and after the fracture were compared. Results: In both groups, a significant change was detected in IIEF-5 score, EHS, SEP-2 and SEP-3 parameters of the patients measured after penile fracture compared to the values before the fracture (all parameters, p < 0.05). No difference was detected in the parameters measured before and after the fracture among surgical repair and conservative treatment groups (all parameters p > 0.05). Mean time passing until the surgery after fracture was measured as 9.6 & PLUSMN; 6.85 h in 19 patients who had surgery. Conclusion: A difference wasn't detected in sexual parameters in conservative treatment and surgical repair groups in this study. As a significant decrease was observed in sexual function parameters even in conservative treatment cases without sudden detumescence and tunica albuginea rupturing, we think that quick surgical exploration would be useful in cases considered to have penile fracture. (c) 2022 Asociacion Espanola de Andrologia, Medicina Sexual y Reproductiva. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.androl.2021.04.006
dc.identifier.issn1698-031X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36319571en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140997304en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.androl.2021.04.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11575
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001013419900001en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Espana Sluen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Internacional De Andrologiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectErectile Dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectEhsen_US
dc.subjectIiefen_US
dc.subjectPenile Fractureen_US
dc.subjectSexual Functionen_US
dc.titleComparison of early period sexual function parameters between surgical repair and conservative treatment after penile fractureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar