Rectal prolapse: our ten-years' experience

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Murat
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKucukkartallar, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorBelviranli, Mehmet M.
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Oemer
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:48:47Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: in this paper we discuss our ten-year experience about rectal prolapse according to literature. METHODS: The study consisted of 60 patients with the diagnosis of rectal prolapse which diagnosed and operated at Necmettin Erbakan university Meram Medical Faculty, Department of general surgery clinic. The study was performed retrospectively approved by the ethics committee. Our study covers patients' gender, age, clinical, preoperative evaluation, surgery and post-operative situations. RESULTS: Patients' 43.3% was male, 56.7% was female. The average age was 51.2. There were complaints in all patients prolapse through the anus. Twenty percent of patients were additional complaints such as bleeding, pain, constipation and incontinence. in the preoperative period proctologic examination, colonoscopy, abdominal ultrasound and defecography were performed. Notaras procedure was the most frequently used method of operation. Thiersch procedure was preferred in patients with emergent incarcerated cases. The average follow up time was 5.95 year. After surgery 86.7% of patients did not have any complaints. CONCLUSIONS: abdominal or perianal interventions can be applied with low risk of complications considering to the patient's condition and experience of the center. at emergent incarcerated cases can be treated step by step. Developing incontinence after surgery is improving at a greater rate with biofeedback therapy. We believe that application of mesh has fewer complications than specified in the literature.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage162en_US
dc.identifier.issn0394-9508
dc.identifier.issn1827-1782
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84982902970en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/17839
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000399097800003en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofChirurgia-Italyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRectal Prolapseen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures Operativeen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Careen_US
dc.titleRectal prolapse: our ten-years' experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu