Base Nasal Bone Resection versus Oblique Nasal Bone Resection: A Comparative Study of the Outcomes for the Deviated Nose

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorInce, Bilsev
dc.contributor.authorDadaci, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:21:17Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:21:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to compare the techniques used for resection of the long side of the base and the top of the bone based on the patient's perspective, surgeon's approach, aesthetic results, complications, and need for secondary surgery in patients with asymmetric nasal bones. This study also aimed to determine the perspective of another plastic surgeon who did not perform rhinoplasty in comparison with the perspective of the primary plastic surgeon. Methods: One hundred sixty-six patients with nasal bone asymmetry between 2010 and 2015 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, those treated with wedge resection of the bony nasal pyramid from the base of the nasal bone; and group 2, those treated with an oblique hump resection. Three different plastic surgeons and plastic surgery nurses who had no information regarding the randomization, patients, and primary plastic surgeon evaluated the surgical results. Results: The mean secondary surgery rate was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1. The mean satisfaction ratio was significantly decreased with different plastic surgeons than with the primary plastic surgeon. Base nasal bone resection was more successful than oblique hump resection in patients with greater than or equal to 0.5-cm nasal bone asymmetry. Conclusions: Surgeons who did not perform the rhinoplasties can evaluate the results differently from the primary surgeon. Performing base bone resection may reduce the secondary surgery rate in patients with greater than or equal to 0.5-cm nasal bone asymmetry.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PRS.0000000000002898
dc.identifier.endpage37Een_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.issn1529-4242
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28027226en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85007393714en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage29Een_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002898
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/13534
dc.identifier.volume139en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000391970900008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlastic And Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleBase Nasal Bone Resection versus Oblique Nasal Bone Resection: A Comparative Study of the Outcomes for the Deviated Noseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu