The Effect of cam and pincer morphology on hamstring injury rates and return to play in elite young male football players

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDinc, Engin
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorAkikol, Mahsum
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:08Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparative effects of different types or parameters of lumbar traction in low back pain (LBP). Methods: CENTRAL, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to March 31, 2021. We considered all RCTs comparing different types or parameters of lumbar traction on adults who complained of LBP with or without lumbar radiculopathy (LR). Any restriction regarding publication time or language was applied. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, performed the quality assessment, and extracted the results. Meta- analysis employed a random-effects model. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, and five were pooled. Meta-analyses of results from five studies on LBP with LR showed no significant difference between diverse tractions modalities at short-term follow-up. Very low to low-quality evidence supports these results. High-force and low-force traction demonstrated clinically significant improvements in pain. Conclusion: The literature suggests the short-term effectiveness of traction on pain in LBP with LR, regardless of the type or the dosage employed. Different effects of traction other the mechanical ones can be hypothesized. This systematic review may be relevant for clinical practice due to the similar effects of different traction types or dosages. Level of Evidence: Level I, Therapeutic Studyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/j.aott.2023.22115
dc.identifier.endpage39en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36939363en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150752414en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage36en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.22115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16729
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000988342300006en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCam And Pincer Morphologyen_US
dc.subjectSocceren_US
dc.subjectFootballen_US
dc.subjectHamstring Injuriesen_US
dc.subjectReturn To Sportsen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of cam and pincer morphology on hamstring injury rates and return to play in elite young male football playersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu