The Characteristics of Patients Returning to Hemodialysis due to Nonfunctioning Graft in Turkey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Ilkem
dc.contributor.authorSelcuk, N. Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorBaloglu, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Kultigin
dc.contributor.authorTonbul, H. Zeki
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:37:45Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractRenal transplantation is the most effective treatment modality for end-stage renal failure. According to the Ministry of Health Organ Transplant Registration System, despite the presence of 14,936 renal transplant recipients in Turkey, there are not enough data about the prognosis of these patients. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain the rate of patients returning to hemodialysis (HD) due to nonfunctioning graft in our country. One thousand four hundred and ninety-eight (males: 826, females: 672) HD patients who undergo HD at 22 HD centers in total, from different geographical regions to represent our country were examined retrospectively. The informations were obtained from patient registry files and anamnesis which were in HD centers. The number of patients returning to HD due to the loss of graft function was 77 (males: 56, females: 21). Eleven of the patients had transplantation from cadavers (14%) and 66 from living donors (86%). Prevelance of patients, who return to HD after the failure of renal transplantation, between HD patients was 5.1. The mean duration of return to HD after renal transplantation was 6.7 +/- 5.9 years for all patients. There was no significant difference in the duration without HD after transplantation between two groups when cadaveric and living donor transplants were compared (P = 0.759). There was no statistically significant difference in duration without HD after transplantation between patients receiving HD treatment before transplantation and preemptive transplant (P = 0.212). The prevelance of patients, who return to HD due to nonfunctioning graft among HD patients was 5.1. The duration without HD were similar after transplantation from both cadavers and living donors. The duration without HD was found longer among those who were operated before 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1319-2442.270260
dc.identifier.endpage1057en_US
dc.identifier.issn1319-2442
dc.identifier.issn2320-3838
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31696843en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074624542en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.270260
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16230
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000522854900007en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Journal Of Kidney Diseases And Transplantationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleThe Characteristics of Patients Returning to Hemodialysis due to Nonfunctioning Graft in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu