How effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Alparslan
dc.contributor.authorMenziletoglu, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorErdur, Emire Aybuke
dc.contributor.authorAkkulah, Sebnem
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:21Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractWe compared the stability and stress analysis of four different fixation methods after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in mandibular models. In the first model (1P1B) we adapted a four-hole, 2.0 mm standard miniplate on the osteotomy line with one bicortical screw at the top. In the second (2P) we placed two four-hole 2.0 mm standard miniplates above and below the osteotomy line. In the third (3B), we applied three inverted L-shaped bicortical screws, and in the last (1RP1B) we used a four-hole miniplate with increased thickness on the osteotomy line with one bicortical screw at the top. A static vertical load of 200 Newtons (N) was then applied to each model from the occlusal of the first molar. The maximum and minimum principal stresses on the bone were observed more in the proximal segment close to the osteotomy line in all groups. Maximum von Mises stresses were 2705.21 Megapascals (MPa), 1633.56 MPa, 1121.4 MPa, and 1734.44 MPa for the 1P1B, 2P, 3B, and 1RP1B groups, respectively. Displacement values were 1.92 mm, 1.15 mm, 0.79 mm, and 1.42 mm for the 1P1B, 2P, 3B, and 1RP1B groups, respectively. The reinforced plate contributed to the stabilisation, but it was not as effective as three bicortical screws and a double plate. (C) 2021 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.11.014
dc.identifier.endpage809en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-4356
dc.identifier.issn1532-1940
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35437194en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128217404en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.11.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11662
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000830147400013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSagittal Split Ramus Osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Advancementen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.titleHow effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu