Diversion of the mandibular canal: Is it the best predictor of inferior alveolar nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery on panoramic radiographs?

dc.contributor.authorTassoker, Melek
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:44:42Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:44:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare the CBCT findings with signs on panoramic radiographs (PRs). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 200 mandibular third molars from 200 patients who showed a close relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars on PRs and were referred for a CBCT examination of the position of the mandibular canal. The sample consisted of 124 females and 76 males, with ages ranging from 18 to 47 years (mean, 25.75 +/- 6.15 years). PRs were evaluated for interruption of the mandibular canal wall, darkening of the roots, diversion of the mandibular canal, and narrowing of the mandibular canal. Correlations between the PR and CBCT findings were statistically analyzed. Results: In total, 146 cases (73%) showed an absence of canal cortication between the mandibular canal and impacted third molar on CBCT images. A statistically significant relationship was found between CBCT and PR findings (P <0.05). The absence of canal cortication on CBCT images was most frequently accompanied by the PR sign of diversion of the mandibular canal (96%) and least frequently by interruption of the mandibular canal wall (65%). Conclusion: CBCT examinations are highly recommended when diversion of the mandibular canal is observed on PR images to reduce the risk of mandibular nerve injury, and this sign appears to be more relevant than other PR signs.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.213
dc.identifier.endpage218en_US
dc.identifier.issn2233-7822
dc.identifier.issn2233-7830
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31583204en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85073630007en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage213en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.213
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/17063
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000487853300005en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofImaging Science In Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Nerveen_US
dc.subjectToothen_US
dc.subjectImpacteden_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRadiographyen_US
dc.subjectPanoramicen_US
dc.titleDiversion of the mandibular canal: Is it the best predictor of inferior alveolar nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery on panoramic radiographs?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar