Determination of Propofol and Isoflurane Anesthesia Depth with Bispectral Index Monitorization in Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy Procedure

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSaritas, Zulfikar Kadir
dc.contributor.authorSaritas, Tuba Berra
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Musa
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:44:58Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:44:58Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, 12 bitches were used to compare anesthetic depth by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and vital parameters under propofol and isoflurane anesthesia. The animals were randomly divided into two groups (n=6) for ovariohysterectomy. All animals were premedicated with atropine sulphate (0.04 mg/kg, sc) and midazolam (0.3 mg/kg, iv). The induction of anesthesia was achieved by propofol (5 mg/kg, iv) in groups. General anesthesia was maintained with propofol (0.4 mg/kg/min.) in first group (PRO group) and 2% isoflurane in second group (ISO group). Non-invasive systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and BIS were measured before anesthesia (0 min, T0), maintenance of anesthesia (T5, T10, T15), end of anesthesia (T30) and additionally BIS also measured at 5 min after the terminating of anesthesia (T35). HR, RR, SAP and DAP did not significantly differ between groups. The MAP value did not show any significant difference within both groups. However, the MAP value detected on T5, T10, T15 and T30 was higher in PRO group than those detected in ISO group (P<0.05). The BIS values detected at all measured times in PRO and ISO groups were lower than those detected before anesthesia. The BIS value detected on T5 and T10 was higher in ISO group, whereas the value determined at T15 was higher in PRO group (P<0.05). In conclusion, it is suggested that bispectral index is a useful tool for monitoring depth of anesthesia in veterinary practice and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol may be used as an alternative to isoflurane anesthesia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.9775/kvfd.2013.9781
dc.identifier.endpage199en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-6045
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84891658147en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage195en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2013.9781
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/17175
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000333080000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKafkas Univ, Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.ispartofKafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBispectral Indexen_US
dc.subjectDogen_US
dc.subjectIsofluraneen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.titleDetermination of Propofol and Isoflurane Anesthesia Depth with Bispectral Index Monitorization in Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy Procedureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu