Are morphological and morphometric characteristics of maxillary anterior region and nasopalatine canal related to each other?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMagat, Guldane
dc.contributor.authorAkyuz, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:59:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:59:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives The main purpose of this article was to clarify the relationship of anterior bone and tooth morphology with NPC. The anatomical features of the NPC region in three dimensions from coronal, axial, and sagittal directions were analyzed using CBCT and the effects of age, gender, sagittal root positions (SRPs) of central teeth, anterior overbite depth (AOD), central incisor (CI)/palatal plane (PP) angle, NPC/PP angle, and collum angles (CA) on NPC were evaluated in a group of the Turkish population. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, CBCTs of a total of 330 individuals between the ages of 17 and 82 were evaluated. The effects of SRP, AOD, CI/PP angle, NPC/PP angle and CA on the anatomical features of NPC were examined on the basis of age and gender. Descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Chi-square, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests were used. p values of < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. Results While the SRPs, CI/PP angle, NPC/PP angle, CA, and age did not differ statistically according to NPC shape (p > 0.05), NPC shape varied according to gender and AOD (p < 0.05). It was found that cylindrical NPC (32.8%) was more common in females, while conical-shaped NPC (30.7%) was more common in males (p < 0.01). While most conical NPC was detected in individuals with Class I overbite depth, cylindrical NPCs were found in Class II and III individuals (p < 0.01). Conclusions The results showed that gender and AOD are influential factors on NPC shape. While conical-shaped NPC is more common in individuals with bite depth incisal, cylindrical-shaped NPC is more likely to be seen in individuals with middle and cervical thirds.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-022-00647-6
dc.identifier.endpage385en_US
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35941313en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135758520en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage372en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00647-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11225
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000837499400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNasopalatine Canalen_US
dc.subjectRoot Positions Of Central Teethen_US
dc.subjectBite Depthen_US
dc.subjectCollum Angleen_US
dc.titleAre morphological and morphometric characteristics of maxillary anterior region and nasopalatine canal related to each other?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu