Effectiveness of Spreader Graft Versus Autospreader Flap in Reducing Nasal Air Resistance

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCemiloglu, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorAricigil, Mitat
dc.contributor.authorBayrakci, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Guelay
dc.contributor.authorArbag, Hamdi
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:23:30Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:23:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective:The authors aimed to compare the functional outcomes of 2 different techniques, spreader graft and autospreader flap, by using them for nasal valve surgery in cadavers using acoustic rhinometry (AR).Method:Ten frozen cadavers who underwent nasal valve surgery between May 2017 and August 2018 were randomly divided into 2 groups. Spreader grafts were applied to 10 nasal valve regions in 1 group, while the autospreader flap method was used on the other 10 nasal valve regions. The effectiveness of the surgical techniques was evaluated utilizing AR.Result:We objectively evaluated the effect of surgery on nasal air resistance by comparing the preoperative and postoperative AR values (MCA1, MCA2, volume) in both the spreader graft and the autospreader flap groups. In addition, the differences in nasal potency gain after the application of both techniques were compared and the superiority of the 2 surgeries in terms of functional gains was evaluated. A statistically significant difference was observed in preoperative and postoperative MCA1, MCA2, and volume values in both the techniques and sides. The authors found more significant nasal valve opening for the spreader graft technique using acoustic rhinometric values when compared with the autospreader flap technique.Conclusions:In both methods, the air resistance was observed to decrease objectively in the nasal valve region. Autospreader flaps increase the nasal valve angle without the need for additional cartilage tissue, and it could be an alternative to spreader grafts.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000009467
dc.identifier.endpage2278en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37259188en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175702056en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009467
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/13583
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001142596600002en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutospreader Flapen_US
dc.subjectNasal Valve Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectSpreader Graften_US
dc.subjectAcoustic Rhinometryen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of Spreader Graft Versus Autospreader Flap in Reducing Nasal Air Resistanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu