Comparison of Different Irrigation Activation Regimens and Conventional Irrigation Techniques for the Removal of Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste from Root Canals

dc.contributor.authorAkman, Melek
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Makbule Bilge
dc.contributor.authorAydinbelge, Hale Ari
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:12:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:12:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of irrigation activation regimens and conventional syringe irrigation technique in the removal of modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) from root canal walls. Methods: Fifty-six extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper rotary files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) up to size F4. The root canals were filled with mTAP medicament, and after 21 days, the roots were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 10) according to the irrigation regimens used: conventional syringe irrigation (Cl), Self-Adjusting File (SAF; ReDent-Nova, Ra'anana, Israel), EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA), EndoActivator (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). In 3 teeth, mTAP was not removed (positive controls), and another 3 teeth were not filled with mTAP (negative controls). The roots were sectioned, and the amount of remaining medicament at each root half (n = 20) was evaluated at 30x magnification using a 4-grade scoring system. Data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: There were statistically significant differences among all experimental groups; of which, the Cl group was the significantly least efficient in removing mTAP from the root canal (P < .05). At the apical and middle third, the PUI, SAF, EndoVac, and EndoActivator groups removed significantly more mTAP medicament than the Cl group (P < .05); however, there were no significant differences between these groups (P > .05). The SAF and PUI showed significantly better performances in removing mTAP from the coronal third (P < .05). Conclusions: The use of irrigation activation regimens significantly improves the removal of mTAP from root canals when compared with Cl.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.001
dc.identifier.endpage724en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25747378en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84929024159en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage720en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/12240
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000354597200025en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndoactivatoren_US
dc.subjectEndovacen_US
dc.subjectModified Triple Antibiotic Pasteen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Adjusting Fileen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonicen_US
dc.titleComparison of Different Irrigation Activation Regimens and Conventional Irrigation Techniques for the Removal of Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste from Root Canalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar