Investigation of the Coeliac Trunk Morphometry with Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOdabasioglu, Mehmet Ercan
dc.contributor.authorCihan, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mehmet Tugrul
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Accurate knowledge of vascular anomalies is critical in surgical interventions, radiology, and organ transplantation procedures. Vascular variations during these procedures can cause serious complications. This study aimed to evaluate the coeliac trunk (CT) and its branches morphometrically, to examine possible variations with multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA), and to compare the obtained data with the findings in the literature. Methods: In this study, abdominal MDCTA images of 126 people taken between April 2014 and April 2016 at Necmettin Erbakan University University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Variation and morphometric analysis of CT and its branches were performed. In the morphometric analysis, diameter measurements were made in centimeters (cm) and compared in terms of sex of the patients. Variation analysis was performed per a useful and simple classification we developed through a comprehensive literature review. Results: Diameter measurements of CT (0.73 +/- 0.13, p=0.002), splenic artery (0.69 +/- 0.1, p=0.0004), common hepatic artery (0.66 +/- 0.1, p=0.042), and left gastric artery (0.27 +/- 0.11, p=0.0001) were statistically significant in men than in women (p<0.05). In our study, type I (normal trifurcation pattern - complete) was detected in 111 (88.09%) cases, and variation was detected in 15 (11.91%) cases. The distribution of these variations is from the most common to the least; type II- (bifurcation-incomplete) 8 (6.34%), type V (additional branches) 5 (3.96%), type IV (coeliomesenteric trunk) 1 (0.79%) and 1 (0.79%) unidentified case. No type III (no CT) variation was found. Conclusion: Variations and anatomy of CT and its branches should always be taken into consideration in clinical studies, angiographic methods, and surgical interventions against possible complications.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/eurjther.2021.20091
dc.identifier.endpage65en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-7040
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.20091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16711
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000637184000010en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal Of Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomic Variationen_US
dc.subjectCeliac Arteryen_US
dc.subjectHepatic Arteryen_US
dc.subjectMultidetector Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the Coeliac Trunk Morphometry with Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu