Comparison of pupillometer, critical care pain observation scale, and vital findings in the evaluation of pain in intensive care patients without oral communication

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYaman Gulper, Rabia
dc.contributor.authorReisli, Ruhiye
dc.contributor.authorArican, Sule
dc.contributor.authorYosunkaya, Alper
dc.contributor.authorTuncer Uzun, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:29:36Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of portable infrared Pupillometer, Critical Care Pain Observation Scale (CPOT), and vital sign changes during painful procedures on patients with mechanical ventilators in the intensive care unit (ICU), and comparing the efficacy of these methods to detect the presence of pain. Methods: In 50 patients who could not verbally state pain, admitted to Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine ICU, aged 18-75 years, and connected to a mechanical ventilator, vital sign changes, CPOT scale assessments, and pain evaluation with a portable infrared pupillometer were performed during endotracheal aspiration and position changes, which are defined as painful stimuli. Results: Data were collected from 50 patients with a mean age of 57.4 +/- 17.9 years and 48% of males. The systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure and heart rate values, CPOT scores, and pupillometric measurements of the patients increased significantly at the time of aspiration and change of position (p<0.05). Neurological pupil index scores showed a significant decrease at the time of painful stimulation (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was found that pupil diameter changes evaluated using a portable infrared pupillometric measuring device can be used effectively and reliably in pain assessment in patients who are treated in the ICU, supported by mechanical ventilation and who cannot communicate verbally.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/agri.2021.72246
dc.identifier.endpage62en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37052165en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152334754en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage53en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.72246
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/14760
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001046513600001en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgri-The Journal Of The Turkish Society Of Algologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Careen_US
dc.subjectPain Observation Scaleen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPupil Diameteren_US
dc.titleComparison of pupillometer, critical care pain observation scale, and vital findings in the evaluation of pain in intensive care patients without oral communicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu