An overlooked complication of the clean intermittent catheters: prostate calculi

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEcer, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Arif
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Mehmet Giray
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Muzaffer Tansel
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:43:45Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:43:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective Although the clinical importance of prostate calculi has been understood over time, it is a urinary system disease that can cause different symptoms and can be ignored by urologists sometime. Clean intermittent catheter (CIC) is the gold standard method for bladder rehabilitation and urinary drainage in patients with neurogenic bladder. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of prostate calculi and related pathologies between patients using CIC and not using CIC. Material-method A total of 314 neurogenic bladder patients who were followed up and treated in our urology clinic were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups as patients non-using CIC (Group-1, n:154) and patients using CIC (Group-2, n:160). Presence of prostate calculi, the number of CIC used per/day, plasma uric acid levels, urine parameters, mean-stone-density (MSD) and calculi sizes were retrospectively scanned from patient records. Results In this study, no significant difference was observed between the parameters such as age, uric acid level, MSD, urine parameters, and other electrolyte levels (Table 1) While the incidence of prostate calculi in Group 1 was 23.4%; The incidence of prostate calculi in group 2 was 37.5(p = 0.007) (Fig. 2). Conclusion In this study, it was tried to show the relationship between the use of CIC and prostate calculi that cause LUTS and dysuria, which are generally ignored in clinical evaluation but do not pass in patients. As a result of this study, it was determined that the incidence of prostate calculi increased in patients using CIC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-023-04417-9
dc.identifier.endpage1640en_US
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issn1433-8726
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37184691en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85159305091en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1635en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04417-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/10904
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000988898800002en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal Of Urologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProstate Calculien_US
dc.subjectProstate Stoneen_US
dc.subjectClean Intermittent Catheteren_US
dc.subjectNeurogenic Bladderen_US
dc.titleAn overlooked complication of the clean intermittent catheters: prostate calculien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu