BIOMECHANICAL FIXATION STRENGTH COMPARISON OF ILIOINGUNIAL AND MEDIAL STOPPA APPROACHES ON ANTERIOR COLUMN FRACTURES

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKacira, Burkay Kutluhan
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKiran, Uygar
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Faik
dc.contributor.authorArazi, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Teyfik
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:26:25Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:26:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both the ilioinguinal and Stoppa approaches have been used as standard methods for treating anterior column fractures of the pelvis. Objective: We aimed to compare the rigidity of pelvises that were treated using these two approaches. Methods: Fifteen synthetic pelvises were used as test models. Of these, 5 pelvises did not undergo any treatment (control group), and 10 pelvises underwent treatment of one column using the ilioinguinal approach and the other using the medial Stoppa approach (treated group). The compression test was performed on all pelvises, and rigidity of the pelvises was compared between the control and treated groups. Results: A statistical difference was found in the angle between the center of the femoral head and the line from the pubic symphysis to load application between the control and treated groups, using the ilioinguinal approach. The parametric displacement was greater in the treated group using the ilioinguinal approach than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the control and treated groups using the Stoppa approach, and the ilioinguinal approaches. Conclusion: Clinically, the Stoppa approach has several advantages over the ilioinguinal approach. However, based on the compression test, there was no difference in biomechanical rigidity between the fixations performed using these two approaches.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S0219519416500810
dc.identifier.issn0219-5194
dc.identifier.issn1793-6810
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84973664419en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519416500810
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/14177
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382846900005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWorld Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Mechanics In Medicine And Biologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior Column Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectMedial Stoppa Approachen_US
dc.subjectIlioinguinal Approachen_US
dc.subjectPelvisen_US
dc.titleBIOMECHANICAL FIXATION STRENGTH COMPARISON OF ILIOINGUNIAL AND MEDIAL STOPPA APPROACHES ON ANTERIOR COLUMN FRACTURESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu