In vitro evaluation of the marginal fit of different all-ceramic crowns

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Munir Tolga
dc.contributor.authorAykent, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorAvunduk, Mustafa Cihat
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:12:46Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:12:46Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: The marginal fit of all-ceramic restorations is a very important criterion for their long-term success. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation of crowns fabricated with four different all-ceramic systems using an image analysis method. Materials and methods: A standardized all-ceramic preparation was made on a stainless steel die. Eighty gypsum dies were duplicated from this die and randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Cerec 3, In-Ceram, IPS Empress 2, and Celay crowns were fabricated on dies of each group following the manufacturers' instructions. Marginal gaps of the crowns were evaluated without cementation on their own gypsum dies and then on the master die with a stereomicro-scope and image analysis program. Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant difference tests were used to evaluate the data (alpha = 0.01). Results: Mean gap dimensions and standard deviations at the marginal opening of the crowns evaluated on the gypsum dies were 21.5 +/- 4 mu m for Celay, 29.3 +/- 5 mu m for IPS Empress 2, 33 +/- 4 mu m for Cerec 3, and 74.6 +/- 10 mu m for In-Ceram crowns. Mean gap dimensions and standard deviations at the marginal opening of crowns evaluated on the master steel die were 27.8 +/- 4 mu m for Celay, 41.5 +/- 7 mu M for IPS Empress 2, 47.4 +/- 5 mu m for Cerec 3, and 94.9 +/- 10 mu m for In-Ceram crowns. Marginal opening values measured on the master die were higher than those of gypsum dies. Conclusion: In-Ceram all-ceramic crowns showed the largest marginal gap, and Celay crowns showed the smallest marginal gap in both die groups. The marginal discrepancies found in this study were all within the clinically acceptable standard of 120 mu m. Copyright (C) 2012, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelcuk University Scientific Research Coordinationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Selcuk University Scientific Research Coordination.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.009
dc.identifier.endpage230en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84885065699en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage225en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/12165
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000325843200002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAll-Ceramicsen_US
dc.subjectCad/Camen_US
dc.subjectCelayen_US
dc.subjectImage Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMarginal Fiten_US
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of the marginal fit of different all-ceramic crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu