Ischemic priapism: Can eosinophil count and platelet functions be positive predictive factors in etiopathogenesis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Mehmet Giray
dc.contributor.authorKara, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorKaraibrahimoglu, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Leyla Ozturk
dc.contributor.authorGoger, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTaskapu, Hakki Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We evaluated the relation between ischemic priapism (IP) and blood count parameters in IP patients. We especially wanted to examine the contribution of eosinophil count (EC), platelet count (PC), and mean platelet volume (MPV) values, which are suspected predictive parameters for vascular endothelium damage and venoocclusive pathogenesis and etiopathogenesis, particularly in IP. Methods: A total of 40 IP patients fulfilled the study criteria. Forty healthy volunteers in a similar age group were included as the control group. Complete blood count values were compared between the two groups. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between categorical variables in the patient groups. The area under the curve was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) regression analyses. Epidemiological diagnosis percentages were calculated by finding cutoff values. Results: The IP group's high MPV, PC, and EC values compared to those of the control group were detected to be statistically significant (p<0.001, p=0,03, p=0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for other blood count parameters. Statistically significant values for IP were measured as MPV: positive predictive value: 84%; EC: positive predictive value: 71.4%; and PC: positive predictive value: 61.4%. Conclusions: High MPV, PC, and EC values are significant positive predictive factors in IP etiopathogenesis. No proof was detected for other blood count parameters playing an active role in IP etiopathogenesis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5489/cuaj.4263
dc.identifier.endpageE301en_US
dc.identifier.issn1911-6470
dc.identifier.issn1920-1214
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28761591en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85023757252en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE297en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4263
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16908
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000405343000008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleIschemic priapism: Can eosinophil count and platelet functions be positive predictive factors in etiopathogenesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu