Strain elastography in the characterization of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma

dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Suat
dc.contributor.authorGuven, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorOzbiner, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorKerimoglu, Ulku
dc.contributor.authorYesildag, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography to differentiate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from angiomyolipoma (AML). Methods: Strain elastography was performed in 65 patients (mean age 55.5 years; range: 32-81) who had renal lesions (24 AMLs and 41 RCCs) prospectively. Lesions were classified according to lesion size and histological subtypes. The strain ratios of the RCCs and AMLs were evaluated by a radiologist. The area under the curve and the cut-off point were used to assess diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were obtained. Results: In assessing the mean strain ratio, we divided the groups in 3 according to size: (1) <20-mm lesions; (2) 20- to 40-mm lesions; and (3) >40-mm lesions; the respective mean strain ratios were: 1.5 +/- 0.5 (range: 0.06-5.92), 2.8 +/- 0.4 (range: 0.17-9.92), 2.7 +/- 0.3 (range: 0.08-6.15). When RCCs and AMLs were compared, there was a statistically significant difference in the strain ratio among the 3 groups divided per lesion size (p < 0.01). For the strain ratio, the mean +/- standard deviation was 1.1 +/- 0.1 for AMLs and 3.4 +/- 0.3 for RCCs (p < 0.01). When lesion subtypes were compared, there was a statistically significant difference in the strain ratio between the AML and clear cell RCC (p < 0.01). Conclusions: For assessing renal lesions, strain elastography and strain ratio values may be useful in differentiating RCCs from AMLs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Urology in Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicineen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Department of Urology in Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5489/cuaj.2349
dc.identifier.endpageE71en_US
dc.identifier.issn1911-6470
dc.identifier.issn1920-1214
dc.identifier.issue1.Şuben_US
dc.identifier.pmid25737764en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84928235320en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE67en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16907
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000350407700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[Keyword Not Available]en_US
dc.titleStrain elastography in the characterization of renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar