Static and kinematic PPP-AR performance of low-cost GNSS receiver in monitoring displacements

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOgutcu, Sermet
dc.contributor.authorAlcay, Salih
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Behlul Numan
dc.contributor.authorKonukseven, Ceren
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:11Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractRecently, low-cost GNSS receivers have played a significant role in displacement monitoring studies due to the increasing availability of mass-market applications. In this work, the performance of static and kinematic PPP-AR using a low-cost u-blox ZED-F9P GNSS receiver in monitoring displacements is investigated by comparing it with a geodetic-grade GNSS receiver using a displacement simula-tion apparatus. The capability to determine the horizontal displacement direction is also investigated for both receivers. The results showed that one-sigma horizontal / vertical RMSEs computed from the true displacements and computed displacements are 1.4 / 5.6 mm and 2.6 / 8.4 mm for the geodetic and u-blox receivers, respectively, using 24-h data with static GPS + GLONASS PPP-AR. It is found that GLONASS contribution to GPS-only static PPP is more evident for the u-blox receiver compared with the geodetic one. RMSEs are found to be higher as observation times are decreased. The post-processed kinematic test results showed that minimum 10 / 20 and 20 / 30 mm horizontal / vertical dynamic displacements can be visually detected as an offset from the daily time series for the geodetic and u-blox receivers, respectively.(c) 2023 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWUHAN University for providing PRIDE PPP-AR II; Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) [MATLAB R2017a]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to express our gratitude to WUHAN University for providing PRIDE PPP-AR II and preciseorbit/clock products. Special thanks to the PRIDE PPP-AR software team for their continued effort to improve the software. All the figures in this study were plotted using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Wessel et al., 2019) and MATLAB R2017a.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.025
dc.identifier.endpage4808en_US
dc.identifier.issn0273-1177
dc.identifier.issn1879-1948
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173068738en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4795en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11625
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001111740100001en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances In Space Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDisplacementen_US
dc.subjectGnssen_US
dc.subjectPpp-Aren_US
dc.subjectU-Bloxen_US
dc.titleStatic and kinematic PPP-AR performance of low-cost GNSS receiver in monitoring displacementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu