Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKozanhan, Betul
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Munise
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Aysenur
dc.contributor.authorGunenc, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Sami Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorIyisoy, Mehmet Sinan
dc.contributor.authorKulhan, Nur Gozde
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:41:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. Methods: Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Results: One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r = -0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score >= 70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P <.001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P =.5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87 and inter-item correlation = 0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate = 0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. Conclusion: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.identifier.issn2667-6370
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36301286en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140370064en_US
dc.identifier.startpage366en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2022.21441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/16768
dc.identifier.volume50en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000957625400009en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Anaesthesiology And Reanimationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectObstetric Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectObsqor-10en_US
dc.subjectPatient-Reported Outcome Measureen_US
dc.subjectPostpartum Recoveryen_US
dc.subjectQuality Of Recoveryen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu