Evaluation of various denture cleansers on color stability and surface topography of polyetherketoneketone, polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylate

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOzyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Ceyda
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T12:16:28Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T12:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sodium perborate effervescent tablets and citric acid solution on the color stability and surface topography of a new generation of high-performance polymer polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), thermoinjection-molded polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Fifty disc-shaped specimens were fabricated (10 mm x 2 mm) from PEKK (P group), polyamide (D group), and PMMA (M group). These groups were divided into five subgroups (n= 10) according to the storage media. The test groups were immersed in the following solutions: distilled water (Control), Corega, Protefix, Perlodent, and Curaprox. The color stability values (Delta E) were measured using a spectrophotometer before and after immersion in distilled water and four different denture cleansers for 8 hr/day for 140 days. Topography alterations after treatments were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test. Thep < .05 was considered significant. All denture cleansers increased the Delta Evalues relative to the baseline values in the M, D, and P groups (p < .05). The Perlodent denture cleanser demonstrated the highest Delta Evalue in all groups, which was unacceptable. Curaprox denture cleanser showed the lowest Delta Evalue in the M and D groups (p < .05). Curaprox in all groups showed a increment Evalue less than 3.7. For patients who have PEKK- and polyamide-based prosthesis, the use of citric acid-based cleansers may be more recommended than sodium perborate-containing cleansers because of its clinically acceptable color changes on polymers in terms of color stability.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jemt.23558
dc.identifier.endpage11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32757255en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088927963en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23558
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/10583
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000555494900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMicroscopy Research And Techniqueen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectColor Stabilityen_US
dc.subjectDenture Cleanseren_US
dc.subjectPolyamideen_US
dc.subjectPolyetherketoneketoneen_US
dc.subjectSurface Topographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of various denture cleansers on color stability and surface topography of polyetherketoneketone, polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu