DO THE CHANGES OF SCAPULOTHORACIC ANGLE AFFECT WINGED SCAPULA DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONAL SCORES DURING CLAVICLE FRACTURE TREATMENT?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Mehmet Rauf
dc.contributor.authorKorucu, Ismail Hakki
dc.contributor.authorYucens, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYorukoglu, Ali Cagdas
dc.contributor.authorSalli, Ali
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Sevket
dc.contributor.authorPekince, Oguzhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:30:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: To compare surgical and conservative management of midshaft clavicle fractures according with scapulothoracic joint angle change, considering clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes. Methods: A total of 95 midshaft clavicle fracture patients aged between 18-70 years with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were included in this study. Patients were treated either conservatively (Group I) or surgically (Group 2). Plane deformities, scapulothoracic joint angle, shortness and isokinetic muscle strength were measured. Shoulder Pain, Disability Index (SPADI) and Short Form-3 6 (SF36) were assessed. Results: Scapulothoracic joint angles were higher in the conservative treatment group than in surgery group (p=0.036). Consequently, winged scapula was seen more commonly in the conservative treatment group than in the surgery group (p=0.001). Surgical treatment was associated with significantly better SF-36 physical scores and with SPADI pain and disability scores. However, the two groups did not differ in terms of isokinetic muscle strength. Negative anteroposterior plane deformity (p<0.001) and negative axial plane deformity (p=0.004) were more frequent in the conserva- tive treatment group. Clavicle shortness was more common in the conservative treatment group. Conclusions: According to our findings scapulothoracic joint angle changes were seen in the conservative treatment group more than in the surgery group. Consequently, winged scapula was seen more commonly in the conservative treatment group than in the surgery group (p=0.001). Level of Evidence III; Retrospective comparative study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1413-785220223001e247742
dc.identifier.issn1413-7852
dc.identifier.issn1809-4406
dc.identifier.pmid35864828en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134051263en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220223001e247742
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/15018
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000848434600006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAtha Comunicacao & Editoraen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Ortopedica Brasileiraen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClavicleen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectBoneen_US
dc.subjectRadiologyen_US
dc.subjectScapulaen_US
dc.titleDO THE CHANGES OF SCAPULOTHORACIC ANGLE AFFECT WINGED SCAPULA DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONAL SCORES DURING CLAVICLE FRACTURE TREATMENT?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu