Comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation that applied synchronous 30 compressions-2 ventilations with that applied asynchronous 110/min compression-10/min ventilation: A mannequin study

dc.contributor.authorKucukceran, Kadir
dc.contributor.authorAyranci, Mustafa Kursat
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Zerrin Defne
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:26:59Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:26:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: CPR model of a resuscitation to be ventilated with a bag valve mask constitutes a discussion when evaluated with the current guidance. Objective: This study aims to compare the synchronous (30-2) ventilation-compression method with asynchronous 110/min compression-10/min ventilation in cardiac arrests where an advanced airway management is not applied and where ventilation is provided by a bag valve mask on a mannequin. Methods: This simulation trial was performed using two clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios: an asynchronous scenario with 10 ventilations per minute asynchronously when compression is applied as 110 compression per minute and a synchronous scenario in which 30 compressions:2 ventilations were performed synchronously. A total of 100 people in 50 groups applied these two scenarios on mannequin. Ventilation and compression data of both scenarios were recorded. Results: Evaluating the compression criteria in both the scenarios performed by 50 groups in total, in terms of all criteria except compression fraction, there was no statistically difference between the two scenarios (p > 0.05). Compression fraction values in the asynchronous scenario were found to be statistically significantly higher than the synchronous scenario (96.02 +/- 2.35, 81.34 +/- 4.42, p < 0.001). Evaluating the ventilation criteria in both the scenarios performed by 50 groups in total; there was a statistically significant difference in all criteria. Mean ventilation rate of the asynchronous scenario was statistically higher than the synchronous scenario (7.22 +/- 2.42, 5.08 +/- 0.75, p < 0.001). Mean ventilation volume of the synchronous scenario was statistically higher than the asynchronous scenario (353.24 +/- 45.46, 527.40 +/- 96.60, p < 0.001). Ventilation ratio in sufficient volume of the synchronous scenario was statistically higher than the asynchronous scenario (36.84 +/- 14.47, 75.00 +/- 21.24, p < 0.001). Ventilation ratio below the minimum volume limit of the asynchronous scenario was statistically higher than the synchronous scenario (62.48 +/- 14.72, 17.86 +/- 19.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that the cardiopulmonary resuscitation applied by the synchronous method reached better ventilation volumes. Evaluating together with any interruption in compression, comprehensive studies are needed to reveal which patients would benefit from this result.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1024907920958861
dc.identifier.endpage145en_US
dc.identifier.issn1024-9079
dc.identifier.issn2309-5407
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091273721en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage139en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1024907920958861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/14409
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000571799500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Journal Of Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBag Valve Masken_US
dc.subjectSynchronous And Asynchronousen_US
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary Resuscitationen_US
dc.titleComparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation that applied synchronous 30 compressions-2 ventilations with that applied asynchronous 110/min compression-10/min ventilation: A mannequin studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar