A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMenziletoglu, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorBasturk, Funda
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Bozkurt Kubilay
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Alparslan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:55:54Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:55:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose Our purpose was to compare the effects of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments on postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and patients' comfort after mandibular third molar surgery. Methods Thirty patients (27 women and 3 men) with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars were included in this split-mouth clinical study. Sixty impacted third molars were divided into a control group (n = 30), in which the osteotomies were performed using a conventional rotary handpiece technique and an experimental group (n = 30), in which the osteotomies were done by piezosurgery technique. Duration of the procedure was recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). All the patients were given a form containing verbal rating scale for evaluating the swelling. Trismus was evaluated using a caliper at maximum mouth opening (cm). In postoperative seventh day, patients were asked to fill a global quality of life (QoL) scale as well. Results There was no significant difference in postoperative pain, trismus, and swelling between control and experimental groups (p > 0.05). However, time of the procedure increased in control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Piezosurgery is a safe way for performing the osteotomies during third molar surgery. However, regarding the postoperative morbidity, it does not have an advantage over conventional rotary instruments. Piezosurgery took longer to complete the osteotomy than the rotary handpiece technique.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7
dc.identifier.endpage55en_US
dc.identifier.issn1865-1550
dc.identifier.issn1865-1569
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31811604en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076291125en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage51en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11010
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000518310200008en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral And Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPiezosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectImpacted Third Molaren_US
dc.subjectTrismusen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.titleA prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu