Comparison of primary repair and repair with polyglycolic acid coated tube in recurrent laryngeal nerve cuts (an experimental study)

dc.contributor.authorSenturk, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKucukkartallar, Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Mehmet Aykut
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Selman
dc.contributor.authorFindik, Siddika
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:02:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:02:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is an important complication of thyroid surgery. In our study, we aimed to compare the effects of primary repair and polyglycolic acid (PGA) coated tube repair on nerve function and regeneration in RLN cuts in rats. Methods: Twenty seven rats were used for the study. Group-1 with only nerve cuts, group-2 with primary repair, and group-3 with conduit repair. The study was planned over two-stage surgery. In the first step, nerve defect formation and nerve repair were performed in the same session. In the second step, samples were taken from the subjects for histopathological. Results: Vocal cord mobility was proportionally higher in group-3 than other groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.239). The mean number of highest axons were detected the group-3. Conclusions: We think that PGA coated conduit can provide a more accurate orientation of nerve fibers by creating an isolated environment when compared to the primary repair. And this may be the cause of functional improvement in the nerve. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.015
dc.identifier.endpage636en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9610
dc.identifier.issn1879-1883
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31248579en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067696345en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11571
dc.identifier.volume219en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000525802700020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRecurrent Laryngeal Nerveen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Repairen_US
dc.subjectRepair With Conduit Polyglycolic Acid Coated Tubeen_US
dc.titleComparison of primary repair and repair with polyglycolic acid coated tube in recurrent laryngeal nerve cuts (an experimental study)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar