Assessment of pupillary light reflex using dynamic pupillometry in laser-treated eyes with retinal vein occlusion

dc.contributor.authorTurk, Huseyin Bugra
dc.contributor.authorBitirgen, Gulfidan
dc.contributor.authorSatirtav, Gunhal
dc.contributor.authorKerimoglu, Hurkan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:27:05Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aims to evaluate the pupillary light reflex measured with dynamic pupillometry in patients who underwent retinal laser photocoagulation due to unilateral retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: A total of 48 patients with unilateral RVO were included in the study. Thirty-four patients had undergone retinal laser photocoagulation while the remaining 14 patients that did not undergo laser treatment were observed for control purposes. Of the laser-treated eyes, 14 eyes (41.2%) had central RVO (CRVO) and 20 eyes (58.8%) had branch RVO (BRVO). Among the 14 patients with RVO without laser treatment, nine eyes (64.3%) had CRVO and five eyes (35.7%) had BRVO. Pupillary light reflexes were assessed with dynamic pupillometry (MonPackOne (R); Metrovision, France). The parameters of the eyes with RVO were compared with that of fellow healthy eyes. Results: Mean patient age was 65.8 +/- 10.4 years and median time after photocoagulation was 25.5 months. Eyes that received laser photocoagulation had lower pupil contraction amplitude (p = 0.037), prolonged contraction latency (p = 0.027), slower contraction velocity (p = 0.043), and slower dilation velocity (p < 0.001) compared to healthy fellow eyes. Subgroup analysis revealed that eyes with CRVO had lower contraction amplitude (p = 0.013) and slower dilation velocity (p = 0.003), and eyes with BRVO had slower dilation velocity (p = 0.003). Non-laser-treated eyes with RVO revealed no significant difference in any of the pupillary light reflex parameters compared to fellow eyes. Conclusion: Laser-treated eyes with RVO demonstrated changes in pupillary light reflex parameters including reduced contraction amplitude, prolonged contraction latency, and slower contraction and dilation velocities measured with dynamic pupillometry.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1120672120969038
dc.identifier.endpage2510en_US
dc.identifier.issn1120-6721
dc.identifier.issn1724-6016
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33118385en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85094632688en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2505en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120969038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/14444
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000678592400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal Of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBranch Retinal Vein Occlusionen_US
dc.subjectCentral Retinal Vein Occlusionen_US
dc.subjectDynamic Pupillometryen_US
dc.subjectLaser Photocoagulationen_US
dc.subjectPupillary Light Reflexen_US
dc.titleAssessment of pupillary light reflex using dynamic pupillometry in laser-treated eyes with retinal vein occlusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar