Reevaluation of Mandibular Morphometry According to Age, Gender, and Side

dc.contributor.authorDirek, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Ismihan Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorKivrak, Ali Sami
dc.contributor.authorUnver Dogan, Nadire
dc.contributor.authorFazliogullari, Zeliha
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Ahmet Kagan
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:23:29Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:23:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aims to reevaluation the linear and angular measurements of mandibles with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) that is a new method and used frequently in recent years. Materials and Methods: The archived MDCT images of 100 adult patients (age range, 15-74 years) without mandibular operation and trauma history were evaluated retrospectively. Mandibular ramus heights, maximal mandibular length, mandibular symphysis height, mandibular angles, and mandibular foramen distance measurements were performed on MDCT images. All measurement parameters were analyzed by gender, age groups, and sides. Results: Mandibular linear length measurements were higher in males than in females (P<0.05). Only mandibular symphysis height was statistically significantly different in age groups (P<0.05). The Angle 1 (gonial angle) was found to be significantly higher in females (P<0.05). The Angle 3 (right condyle-gnathion-left condyle angle) was observed to be significantly higher in the 60+ age group (P<0.05). The 3 of the mandibular foramen measurements (distance from the front edge, distance to gonion, and height of lingula) were found to be higher in males than in females (P<0.05). There were no significant differences according to age groups in these measurements. The lengths of the mandibular canals were higher in males (44.72mm) than in females (41.68mm). There was no statistically significant difference was found between gender, age groups, and sides of mandibular canal length. Conclusion: The MDCT was found to be a reliable method for the detection of mandibular morphometry when compared with the results of other radiographic images studies.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000004293
dc.identifier.endpage1059en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29461369en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048078723en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1054en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/13573
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000434304300093en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGonial Angleen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Foramenen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Lingulaen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Ramusen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Symphysisen_US
dc.subjectMdcten_US
dc.titleReevaluation of Mandibular Morphometry According to Age, Gender, and Sideen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar