Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCetmili, Hayriye
dc.contributor.authorTassoker, Melek
dc.contributor.authorSener, Sevgi
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T13:59:30Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T13:59:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare intraoral radiographs and CBCT images for detection of horizontal periodontal bone loss, and to investigate the diagnostic effect of different voxel resolutions in CBCT imaging.MethodsA total of 240 sites with horizontal bone loss were measured on the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces of 60 posterior teeth in four maxillary and six mandibular bones obtained from cadavers (dry skulls). Direct measurements on the dry skulls were accepted as the gold standard values. Measurements on CBCT images at two different voxel resolutions (0.250 and 0.160 mm(3)) and intraoral bitewing radiographs were compared with one another and with the gold standard values.ResultsThe measurements on the CBCT images at two voxel resolutions and bitewing radiographs did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from the direct measurements on the dry skulls. No significant difference was found between the bitewing radiographs and CBCT images for measurements in the mesial and distal regions (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the measurements on the buccal and lingual surfaces at the two different voxel resolutions (p>0.05).ConclusionsCBCT scans are recommended for evaluation of buccal and lingual bone loss to avoid intraoral radiographs that exceed routine examination of interproximal alveolar bone loss. Furthermore, instead of basing the voxel size on the required CBCT scans, it is recommended to select the smallest possible field of view to reduce the dose of radiation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-018-0336-x
dc.identifier.endpage183en_US
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30484193en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048300671en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage177en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0336-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/11221
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000464910400009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCbcten_US
dc.subjectVoxelen_US
dc.subjectPeriodontal Bone Lossen_US
dc.subjectBitewing Radiographyen_US
dc.titleComparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu