The Comparison of Kutadgu Bilig Copies in Terms of Archaism

dc.contributor.authorMert, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T14:48:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T14:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentNEÜen_US
dc.description.abstractKarakhanid Turkish had been used as common written language among Turks in the 11th and 12th centuries. Only few books written in Karakhanid Turkish could survive until today. One of these few books is Qutadgu Bilig. The manuscript written by the author of this book, which has three copies written at various times and in various places, is lost. This situation gave birth to the question about which one of the copies is more archaic. There is a general belief in Turcology about Fergana copy as being older in comparison with two other copies. In this study, the aforementioned belief was attempted to be scientifically proved by means of the linguistic evidences. Three copies of Qutadgu Bilig were compared to detect which copy is the closest to the manuscript written by its author. Copies were compared under three headlines as morphology, phonetics, and vocabulary. At the end of the assessment, it came out that the copy of Ferghana is more archaic compared to the other two copies, that the copy of Herat is the new copy; and it is concluded that the Egyptian copy stands closer to the copy of Ferghana.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage215en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-0549
dc.identifier.issue80en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/17895
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000397203100008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherAhmet Yesevi Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiligen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOld Turkicen_US
dc.subjectKarakhanid Turkicen_US
dc.subjectQutadgu Biligen_US
dc.subjectArchaismen_US
dc.subjectSpellingen_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Kutadgu Bilig Copies in Terms of Archaismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar