Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, quality, and readability of online patient information materials on coccyx injury
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2023
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
The aim of this research is to evaluate the websites containing “coccydynia, coccyx trauma or fracture” in terms of readability,
reliability, accuracy, and quality. Searches for “coccydynia, coccyx trauma, coccyx fracture” were carried out in the 3 most
used search engines in the USA: Google, Yahoo, and Bing in February 2022. A total of 141 websites were rated by 2 different
neurosurgeons for the “Global Quality Score” and “Alexa Popularity Rank.” 97.2% of the sites examined include the definition of
the disease, 66% include the importance of the disease, 92.9% include the symptoms of the disease, 88.7% include the treatment
of the disease, 78% include the signs of the disease, 77.3% include the mechanism of the disease It has been determined that the
websites examined within the scope of the research have high global quality score (GQS) and APR and are enriched with images
to a large extent.
Abbreviations: APR = Alexa popularity rank, ARI = automated readability index, CLI = Coleman-Liau Index, FKGL = FleschKincaid Grade Level, FRES = Flesch reading ease, GQS = global quality score, Gunning FOG = Gunning Fog Index, LWF = Linsear
Write Formula, SMOG = simple measure of gobbledygook
Açıklama
Makale
WOS:000928222100009
PubMed ID:36701705
WOS:000928222100009
PubMed ID:36701705
Anahtar Kelimeler
Coccydynia, Coccyx Fracture, Coccyx Trauma, Readability
Kaynak
Medicine
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Q3
Cilt
102
Sayı
3
Künye
İzci, E. K., Keskin, F. (2023). Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, quality, and readability of online patient information materials on coccyx injury. Medicine, 102, 3, 1-5.
