Serahsi’de ilim-zan bakımından şer’i deliller ve yoruma yansımaları

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇalış, Halit
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-18T21:12:59Z
dc.date.available2020-01-18T21:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentNEÜ, Ahmet Keleşoğlu İlahiyat Fakültesi, Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractSerahsî delilleri, içerdiği bilginin karşı ihtimali bütünüyle bertaraf edip etmemesi ölçütünden hareketle ilim gerektirenler, zan gerektirenler şeklinde tasnif eder. Kitap, mütevatir sünnet, Hz. Peygamber'den (s.a.s.) bizzat işitilen bilgi ve icmâ, ilim gerektiren delillerdir. Haber-i Vâhidler, zan gerektirmekle birlikte gereğiyle amelde bulunmak vâciptir. Delillerin yorumlanması ve hüküm istinbadında zan gerektiren deliller, ilim gerektiren delillerin denetimine tabi kılınır. Bu metodik tavır, teâruzu'l-edille, tahsis, nesih ve nassa ziyâde gibi yorum şekillerinin tamamında belirleyicidir.en_US
dc.description.abstractSarakhsi classifies Islamic legal sources as either ‘certainty-bearing’ or ‘doubt-bearing’ based on Whether the information it contains eliminates the opposite possibility or not. The Qur’an, collective memory of prophetic practice (sunna mutawatira), knowledge obtained directly from the Prophet (pbuh) and concensus (ijma) are legal sources that bear certainty (‘ilm). However, single reports (Khabar al-Wahid) need to be treated with doubt (zann) and it is compulsory (vajib) to act accordingly. During the interpretation of legal sources and extraction of legal rulings, legal sources that bear doubt are being Sarakhsi classifies Islamic legal sources as either ‘certaintybearing’ or ‘doubt-bearing’ based on Whether the information it contains eliminates the opposite possibility or not. The Qur’an, collective memory of prophetic practice (sunna mutawatira), knowledge obtained directly from the Prophet (pbuh) and concensus (ijma) are legal sources that bear certainty (‘ilm). However, single reports (Khabar al-Wahid) need to be treated with doubt (zann) and it is compulsory (vajib) to act accordingly. During the interpretation of legal sources and extraction of legal rulings, legal sources that bear doubt are being supervised and dominated by the sources that have certainty in their nature. The methodological approach is characteristic in classical issues like mutual contradiction of proof-texts (taarudh al-adillah), takhsis, abrogation (naskh), in addition to the text (ziyada ala al-nass).en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇalış, H. (2013). Serahsi'de ilim-zan bakımından şer’i deliller ve yoruma yansımaları. Diyanet İlmi Dergi, 49, 2, 122-134.
dc.identifier.endpage134en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-8498en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage122en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpneE5UUTBOQT09/serahsi-de-ilim-zan-bakimindan-ser-i-deliller-ve-yoruma-yansimalar
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12452/2893
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiyanet İlmi Dergien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSerahsien_US
dc.subjectDelilen_US
dc.subjectİlimen_US
dc.subjectZanen_US
dc.subjectTahsisen_US
dc.subjectNesihen_US
dc.subjectSarakhsien_US
dc.subjectEvidenceen_US
dc.subjectCertain knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectDoubten_US
dc.subjectTakhsisen_US
dc.subjectAbrogationen_US
dc.titleSerahsi’de ilim-zan bakımından şer’i deliller ve yoruma yansımalarıen_US
dc.title.alternativeCertainty and Doubtfulness of Islamic Legal Sources According to Sarakhsi and Its Reflections on Interpretationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Serahsi’de ilim-zan bakımından şer’i deliller ve yoruma yansımalar-sayfalar-2-13.pdf
Boyut:
143.24 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin (Full Text)
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu