Lügavî İbdâl ve ilk dönem arap lehçeleri üzerindeki etkisi
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
İlk dönem Arap lehçeleri sentaks, semantik, morfolojik ve fonetik açılarından farklılık göstermektedir. Fonetik bakımdan farklılık meydana getiren sebeplerden biri ‘Lügavî İbdâl, yani mahreç yakınlığına bağlı ibdâl’ dır. Bu çeşit ibdâlin oluşumunda herhangi bir şart ve kural bulunmamaktadır. Lügavî İbdâlin kullanımında kabileler arasında farklılık görülmektedir. Bu farklı kullanımlar semâî yolla oluşmuştur, bir şart ve kurala bağlı olmaksızın meydana gelmiştir. Bu makalede ‘Lügavî İbdâl’ oluşumuna izin veren harflerin mahreç ve sıfatlarına dayanarak incelenmesi yapılmakta ve bunlar da şu şekilde sıralanmaktadır: Mütecânis harfler, Mütecâvir harfler, Mütekârib harfler ve Mütebâid harfler arasında ibdâl. Ayrıca bu taksime beşinci olarak ilk dönem dilcilerin ibdal olarak kabul ettiği fakat bundan farklı olan diğer bir çeşit eklenebilir. Kabilelerine nispet edilmeyen bazı ibdâl rivayetleri bulunmaktadır. Bu rivayetler ilk dönem dilcilerin tarafından ibdâl olarak kabul görmüştür. Fakat son dönem dilciler, bunların mübdel ve mübdel-minh harfleri arasında sıfat ve mahreç bakımından ortak özelliğe sahip olmamaları nedeniyle bu görüşe katılmamaktadır. Lügavî İbdâl, bu çalışmada dildeki örnekler ve Kuran kıraatlerinde geçtiği yerler açısından incelenmiş ve ilk ve son dönem âlimlerinin görüşleri ile aralarındaki tartışılmaları ele alınmıştır.
The old Arabic dialects differed among themselves at the grammatical, conjugational, semantic and phonetic levels. One of the reasons for their difference at the phonological level sat on the linguistic alternation, which does not adhere to certain conditions and rules, but it is limited to hearing, and is specific to some tribes only.The linguistic alternation has been studied in this article for the letters that allow the substitution among themselves based on the pronunciation of the letters and their attributes among them were:the alternation between homogeneous letters, similar sounding letters and letters with similar or different character's features and pronunciation, and what the old linguists considered as a linguistic alternation although it does not apply to it, where some narratives were not attributed to their tribes, which linguists considered to be alternation, which were rejected by some modernists; because of the divergence of the altered characters characteristically and pronouncedly, with some examples of each as well as what was mentioned in the Qur'anic recitations.These characters were studied through the opinions of ancient and modern scholars, in addition some opinions that support this type of alternation, as well as those who disagreed with it, and the reasons for their differences were discussed.In this study, linguistic alternation was examined in terms of the examples in the language and the places in the Quranic Recitations of the first and last scholars and their discussionswere discussed .
ياختلفت اللهجات العربية القديمة فيما بينها على المستوى النحوي والصرفي والدلا وتي، ومن أسباب ىلعروصقموهامنإ؛ةنيعمطباوضوطورشبديقتيلايذلا؛يوغّللالادبلإايتوصلاىوتسملاىلعاهفلاتخاالسمع، وهو خاص ببعض القبائل دون غيرها.ىلعدمتعيبيترتقفواهنيباميفلادبلإلحمستيتلافرحلألةلاقملاهذهيفيوغللالادبلإاَسِرُددقومخارج الحروف وصفاتها، فكان منها: الإبدال بين الحروف المتجانسة والمتجاورة والمتقاربة والمتباعدة وما حسبه يتلاو،اهلئابقىلإبَسنُتمليتلاتاياورلاضعبتدروثيح،لادبلإاهيلعقبطنيلاوًلاادبإىمادقلانويوغللاُملاضعباهضفرامنيب،لادبلإانمنويوغللااهربتعامهنملدبملاولدبملانيفرحلادعابتببسب؛نيثَدحًاجرخنمفرحلأاهذهتَسٍرُددقو.ةينآرقلاتاءارقلايفاهنمدروامركذواهنملكلةلثملأاضعبركذعم،ةفصوفاضلإاب،لادبلإانمعونلااذهتللعيتلاءارلآاضعبتَرِكُذامك،نيِثَدحُملاوىمادقلاءاملعلاءارآللاخةإلى .مهنيبفلاتخلاابابسأتشقونو،نيِثَدحُملانملادبلإانمعونلااذهفلاخنمءارآومن خلال دراسة الإبدال اللغوي بين تلك الحروف نوقشت عدة قضايا اختلف فيها العلماءالقدماء فيما بينهم وفيما بين العلماء القدماء وبين المحدثين
The old Arabic dialects differed among themselves at the grammatical, conjugational, semantic and phonetic levels. One of the reasons for their difference at the phonological level sat on the linguistic alternation, which does not adhere to certain conditions and rules, but it is limited to hearing, and is specific to some tribes only.The linguistic alternation has been studied in this article for the letters that allow the substitution among themselves based on the pronunciation of the letters and their attributes among them were:the alternation between homogeneous letters, similar sounding letters and letters with similar or different character's features and pronunciation, and what the old linguists considered as a linguistic alternation although it does not apply to it, where some narratives were not attributed to their tribes, which linguists considered to be alternation, which were rejected by some modernists; because of the divergence of the altered characters characteristically and pronouncedly, with some examples of each as well as what was mentioned in the Qur'anic recitations.These characters were studied through the opinions of ancient and modern scholars, in addition some opinions that support this type of alternation, as well as those who disagreed with it, and the reasons for their differences were discussed.In this study, linguistic alternation was examined in terms of the examples in the language and the places in the Quranic Recitations of the first and last scholars and their discussionswere discussed .
ياختلفت اللهجات العربية القديمة فيما بينها على المستوى النحوي والصرفي والدلا وتي، ومن أسباب ىلعروصقموهامنإ؛ةنيعمطباوضوطورشبديقتيلايذلا؛يوغّللالادبلإايتوصلاىوتسملاىلعاهفلاتخاالسمع، وهو خاص ببعض القبائل دون غيرها.ىلعدمتعيبيترتقفواهنيباميفلادبلإلحمستيتلافرحلألةلاقملاهذهيفيوغللالادبلإاَسِرُددقومخارج الحروف وصفاتها، فكان منها: الإبدال بين الحروف المتجانسة والمتجاورة والمتقاربة والمتباعدة وما حسبه يتلاو،اهلئابقىلإبَسنُتمليتلاتاياورلاضعبتدروثيح،لادبلإاهيلعقبطنيلاوًلاادبإىمادقلانويوغللاُملاضعباهضفرامنيب،لادبلإانمنويوغللااهربتعامهنملدبملاولدبملانيفرحلادعابتببسب؛نيثَدحًاجرخنمفرحلأاهذهتَسٍرُددقو.ةينآرقلاتاءارقلايفاهنمدروامركذواهنملكلةلثملأاضعبركذعم،ةفصوفاضلإاب،لادبلإانمعونلااذهتللعيتلاءارلآاضعبتَرِكُذامك،نيِثَدحُملاوىمادقلاءاملعلاءارآللاخةإلى .مهنيبفلاتخلاابابسأتشقونو،نيِثَدحُملانملادبلإانمعونلااذهفلاخنمءارآومن خلال دراسة الإبدال اللغوي بين تلك الحروف نوقشت عدة قضايا اختلف فيها العلماءالقدماء فيما بينهم وفيما بين العلماء القدماء وبين المحدثين
Açıklama
Makale
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kadîm Arap Lahçeleri, Lügavî İbdâl, Kur’ân Kıraatleri, Fonetik Düzey, Harflerin Mahreçleri, Harflerin Sıfatları, Ancient Arabic Dialects, Linguistic Alternation, Quranic Recitations and Readings, Phonetic Level, Letter Pronunciation, Character Attributes, اللهجات العربية القديمة, الإبدال اللغوي, القراءات القرآنية, المستوى الصوت, .لحروف مخارج, صفات الحروف
Kaynak
Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
48
Sayı
48
Künye
Saleh, M.H., Arslan, İ. (2019). Lügavî İbdâl ve ilk dönem arap lehçeleri üzerindeki etkisi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 48, 48, 545-565.
